Working Moms VS Non Working Moms free essay sample

Every mother has different circumstances to decide eather to stay home with their children or to resume work as soon as they can. Some families need the extra money to support their children while others make enough to live comfortably while only the father works. The world will never be happy with the way families choose to raise their children. Mothers that works and stay-at- home moms may raise their children differently, but neither is better than the other. Weather they are stay-at-home moms or working moms society will find a way to discriminate them. Employed mothers seem to always get the bad end of the deal. Just because a other works does not mean that she is a bad mother. Her children may act out and people Just assume that it is probably because she is a working mom and does not spend much time with her children. People do not look into the situation. We will write a custom essay sample on Working Moms VS Non Working Moms or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page That mom may be a mom that works all day long and comes home and goes straight to bed, but she may also be a loving mother that comes home and cooks dinner for her family sun-e 2 and spends quality time with them outside of work. Her children may Just be having a rough time at school or with friends. Research shows that daughters of employed others have higher academic achievement and greater career success. They have also been found to be more independent and show less acting-out behavior. Studies have shown that sons of employed mothers have lower I. Q scores. It has also been documented that the sons did well academically but their was a strain on their father-son relationship because men felt as if the women were running the family. According to The Effects of the Mothers Employment on the Family and the Child the majority of sons and daughters of employed mothers agreed that men could do female activities and women could do male activities. They said that both men and women were equal and that if a women was working all day it was only fair if her spouse helped do chores around their home. Children of working mothers have been shown to be more responsible at a younger age. If their mom is working the children would be asked to help do chores around the house. They also have to learn to do things on their own sometimes because with their mom working they may not always be there at the exact time that they need them. A mother being employed does have some negative effects on a family, but for the most part a working mothers children howed higher test scores, good behavior, and daughters seemed to have more self- esteem. From television, people Just assume that stay-at-home have the perfect families. On TV, the kids of stay-at-home moms do great in school and behave really well, while of for their family. In all actuality most stay-at-home moms have young children that they are constantly chasing around and taking care of so their homes may never really be that super clean house. They spend their days cleaning up after their children, cooking meals for their families, and spending quality time with their children teaching them Suire 3 things. Studies have actually shown that children with stay-at-home mothers score lower on many school standardized tests and IQ tests. It has also been shown that children in these families do not believe that the mother can do things that their father can do, and that their father should not have to help clean and cook in the home. In most of the studies done in The Effects of the Mothers Employment on the Family and the Child, the children of stay-at-home moms scored lower on nearly almost every test. The children seemed to be slower in school and less sociable. It was harder for them to interact with other children because most of them had Just een around their mother until it was time for them to begin their schooling years. A lot of the children also had behavior issues. They got too much attention as a child so they were used to being the center of attention. They would act in in school so classmates and teachers would notice and give them the attention they were so used to always receiving. These children were also less independent. They were used to having everything handed to them by their mothers and expected everyone to Just do everything for them. Children with stay-at-home moms struggle more in school and have a harder time picking up on things. Although studies have shown many negative things about children with stay-at-home moms, there are also many benefits. Some experts in early childhood development believe theres no substitute for the consistency and nurturing of parental care, especially if the alternative is poorly funded childcare. (http://www. babycenter. com/o_staying-at-home-pros-and- cons_6025. bc) Studies have shown that children that spend all day in daycares have more stress and agression than the ones cared for at home. Stay-at-home mothers have the advantage of knowing that their children are being taken care of by a erson that will always be around. They also get to be there for all of their childrens firsts and it is not a stranger getting to see them walk or talk first. Staying home with children saves families a Suire 4 lot of money, because daycares can be very expensive. Stay-at-home moms are not how they are portrayed on television, but they are not bad mothers it is great that they can spend so much time with their children while they are young.

Let Him Have It Essays

Let Him Have It Essays Let Him Have It Essay Let Him Have It Essay In the film version of the case of Craig and Bently-Let Him Have it the director has chosen to be bias and uses it in different ways. Bias is when you only have a one sided view of something. The film can show that the director is biased. The things that show this are that you get much more background information on Derek Bently and his family. Immediately this favours Derek Bently as the audience watching feel closer and more informer on his background, so therefore they know more about him and want him to win this case. The director has chosen go give information and situations of Dereks epilepsy. The first scene of the film is of the blitz in the war and Derek under the rouble. This is what the doctors thought caused the epilepsy. The director also chooses to show Derek in a situation where he starts to have an epileptic fit, once his parents have decided to let him go out on his own. Both these ideas that the director has selected can make the audience feel pity for Derek seeing as in the film the doctors say that because of his condition he is believed to have the mind of an 11-year-old. On the other hand Christopher Craig has not been focussed on as much as Bentley. The only background information given about Craig is that he is a bad influence and can be a gangster, as he has grown up with an older brother. The director chooses to show the audience the scene where Craigs brother Neven is arrested. This can show that Craigs family is not very loving and can be rather rough. These background facts are of a negative nature. Other than Craigs brother, we do not get any other information about his family. Derek Bentleys family; Iris, hi smother and his father, play a very big role in the whole story, and the audience is shown that Derek has a warm and loving home life and is given the care he needs with his condition. The audience can see that before Derek Bently came into contact with Christopher Craig he was a pleasant boy. He was influenced and could have maybe felt pressured to act gangster like around him, so he went ahead with the scam of the butchers warehouse. This however all goes wrong and a police officer is accidentally murdered! One scene that shows bias in the film is the trial scene. This showed bias as throughout the scene it seemed as though Derek Bentley was receiving an unfair trial. The director used many things to show bias towards Bentley in this scene he uses language, music, colour, camera shots and the setting and scenery. These collectively show a very one-sided view of the murder and the trial. In the trial scene Medek uses characterisation to show bias. Chris Craig is presented to be a very sarcastic, guilty boy. He is made out to be the villain. When he was given his sentence after being given his sentence there is a shot of him smiling. This showed Craig as not even caring that he has been proven guilty for murder. Also he is sarcastic when the judge asked if he took his guns to school, Craig replied Well not all at the same time. This shows a lack of respect for he judge and Craig is again perceived as the villain. However Bentley is shown to be very nervous and scared about what could happen. We are told that Bentley is illiterate and not very intelligent this also made the audience sympathise as it was why he was acting in the way he was. He didnt seem to know what to do or say, his head was mostly down and gave very short quick answers to the prosecutor. Another character was the judge he portrayed bias, as he seemed to already know who was guilty before even sentenc ing. When making a closing statement he emphasised the fact the Bentley had a knuckle-duster he said it was a, horrible weapon. This shows bias as the judge is supposed to be an impartial person who looks fairly at the evidence and is not supposed to sway the jury in any way. This gives the impression that Bentley was not given a fair trial. In the trial scene a combination of many things that encourage bias. The first of these is music. Music is only used for a few seconds; this is while Bentley is being taken down to his cell. This was very solemn music played by violins that make you feel very sorry for Bentley. Also colour is used to great effect. For example Bentley is wearing a pale blue suit whereas most other people are wearing dark suits. This shows Bentley to look very innocent also because it would seem that he does not know what to wear in this sort of situation as it is all new to him. Whereas Craig seems very comfortable and confident as if he knows exactly what is going to happen, as if it were routine for him. Also camera shots are used effectively. One effective use of the camera was when you could see the courtroom from Bentleys eyes. When he looked at the jury he moved on quickly however when he saw at his family he moved across slowly as he was looking for help and support. Also it shows that Bentley has a loving family, and on the other hand Craig has no family present that we can see. The only actually family we are introduced to in the film is his older brother who was arrested and taken to prison. This would make you think that if Bentley had such a caring family why would he want to help to kill someone. Also the camera shot of Bentley eventually gets closer and closer to him. Here you can see that he is trembling and is incredibly upset, this would make people very sympathetic. Craig was only shown to being sarcastic and rude. This has shown that Peter Medek was very successful at achieving sympathy from the audience for Derek Bentley and his family through bias. The overall dramatic impact of the directors effects is likely to make viewers believe that Bentley was given an unfair trial and was innocent. As well as this they are likely to believe that Craig was a very manipulative person who persuaded Bentley to go with him. Also Craig was shown to be an arrogant person who cares only about himself.